It’s likely that this is the first time hearing about what’s known as the User Service Platform (USP). It’s also possible that you’re curious about the TR-369. TR-369USP is a technically advanced standard that provides more information on the data model and applications layer protocols, which is great for remote control and control of devices connected to it.
It’s impossible to talk about the TR-369 protocol without mentioning its predecessor: TR-069. The time that the Broadband Forum came up with CPE WAN Management Protocol (CWMP) which was also known as TR-069, after the title of its technical specifications it was the ideal solution to remotely manage routers, modems, and gateways. It’s true that it was the year 2004 and it’s likely that you had only one computer at home. You couldn’t stream your favorite movies through Netflix and your fridge certainly didn’t send you a heads-up that you’re going to be out of kale. This is why that a bidirectional connection to CPE CPE along with the autoconfiguration server (ACS) that defines TR-069 was a feasible choice at the time. Fast forward to 15 years later and an entire world of connected devices, and it’s possible that CWMP isn’t sufficient to deploy services that permit several users to manage the perpetually growing devices independently.
According to axiros.com TR-369 USP is the standard for managing the lifecycle of devices. This advancement can be attributed to remarkable initiatives of the Broadband Forum of 2004. The group developed its CPE WAN Management Protocol (CWMP) or TR-069 which allowed for the easy search of the right solution to manage remote routers, modems or gateways.
The majority of houses or buildings were equipped with a PC however it was not easy to stream live TV via platforms like Netflix. Incredibly, your refrigerator couldn’t not also notify you when your food items are deteriorating or are running out. The only way to tell was an unidirectional communication between auto-configuration servers (ACS) and the CPE (Customer Premises Equipment).
With the numerous technological advances that we’re witnessing, CWMP is no longer an efficient solution for the world that is connected gadgets. It’s not enough to arrange services that permit multiple users to manage their huge collection of devices. However, TR-369 has offered practical solutions , and has provided many individuals or institutions who require relief.
Major USP/TR-369 Management Functions
There has been a lot of change since TR-369 as this technology has allowed it to be easier to accomplish a great deal for lifecycle management of connected devices. In this regard, the main USP management tasks are:
Lifecycle Management
The management of lifecycles for all devices connected to the residential network is an essential role TR-369 played. This protocol makes it possible to affect the entire lifecycle of the devices connected. It makes it simple to manage the provisioning of services as well as device configuration along with device identification.
Device Upgradability
TR-369 ensures that devices can be upgraded, and users can rest in the knowledge that firmware updates will be more effective software extensions, software updates, as well as security updates. Controllers will be alerted whenever an event occurs and are able to act in a timely manner and in the shortest amount of timeframe. Therefore, they can benefit from the latest firmware and be assured that they will get the most efficient performance of their devices.
Bring Devices into Service
With the TR-369/User Service Platform It will be simpler to incorporate brand new, connected devices into service. They can function efficiently without technical or security glitches.
Status Monitoring
TR-369 is an important instrument that helps monitor connected devices and provide alerts regarding their performance. They also will act upon the home network’s connections and services.
Quality of Service Monitoring
QoS lets you monitor client and network services like DNS, firewalls, hosted user access and connections. It makes it simple for the provider to assess the performance metrics of the device as well as the quality of the service.
Quality of Experience Monitoring
USP permits Telcos as well as service companies to track the device’s quality and determine how long you are able to utilize it for. QoE will help determine the kind of experience users are getting with regards to quality. This process includes monitoring the parameters of the home ecosystem service.
To Sum Up
TR-369/USP is now an essential instrument to many service companies in today’s technological age. It’s made it easier for homes and commercial locations to effectively control, monitor, update and control the Wi-Fi device they have. USP has improved IoT device management simpler, ensures the ability to relay messages in a variety of ways and has an extremely robust design that specifies the right data transfer process between the provider and user. This makes it a powerful instrument that will revolutionize the entire market.
TR-369 was developed to fill a gap that was created as the world of smart devices started to change quickly. But, it wasn’t designed to replace its predecessors, as there are still instances in which it’s adequate for deployment, particularly in the event that there is an existing compatible framework in the market. In spite of all that, TR-069 still remains an industry standard that has an established success rate of numerous successful stories. If you are looking to take the next step it is important to ensure that your auto-configuration server – whether in the cloud or is on-prem is able to work with both protocols at the same time.
Since you’ll likely not be updating your entire fleet at one go , and it’s possible that there are equipment that will not need to be upgraded. That’s why it’s essential for the device management platform to be able to manage both TR-069 and TR-369 so that they can be used together within your deployment.
There’s certainly an argument to be made for an emerging standard being created in conjunction with industry experts by an established standards body like Broadband Forum. Broadband Forum. But be aware that there are a myriad of alternatives available for you to think about. They all have similar qualifications, like for instance LwM2M which was designed to address the requirements of the ever-growing IoT world. As with all standards, there isn’t a definitive answer to the question: which standard is the most effective. It is only a matter of asking: what is the most suitable to use for your project?
